Security Council official records, 34TH year. supplement for July, August, and September 1979.

publisher: United Nations GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Publishing date: 1981-01-01

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS, 34TH YEAR. SUPPLEMENT FOR JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER 1979.

Publication Date:01 Jan, 1981

VISIT TO THE SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC

Meetings with government officials The Commission arrived at Damascus on 26 May and was received the following day at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by Mr. Abdul Halim Khaddam, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs.

He was accompanied by Mr. Haitham Keylani, Director of the International Organizations Division and other officials from the Foreign Ministry.

The Deputy Prime Minister welcomed the Commission and assured it of the full co-operation of his Government in the implementation of its mandate. All that Syria the truth be established, because truth was more powerful than military force. In that connexion he described Israel’s policy of settlements as nothing but the continuation of the aggressive and expansionist practices which had characterized the Zionist movement since its very beginning and which remained the real obstacle to peace.

Mr. Khaddam blamed Israel for the current situation and the United States which, he said, bore a share of the responsibility for facilitating Israel’s policy of settlement. He a1so deplored that the United Nations could not take a stronger stand in that regard.

Referring to the policies pursued by Egypt and the United States, Mr. Khaddam emphasized that they did not serve the cause of peace in the area. The so-called autonomy envisaged for the Palestinians of the occupied territories in the peace treaty between Israel and the Egyptian regime would apply only to the inhabitants but the land and its resources would remain indefinitely under the authority of Israel. For the Syrian Government, it was clear therefore that such an agreement which did not tackle the real problem could not serve the cause of peace in the area. Mr. Keylani noted in that regard as a further proof of it that the number of Israeli air raids over Lebanon had increased 10 times since the signing of the treaty.

In his reply, the Chairman expressed the Commission’s appreciation for the welcome extended to it and assured the Deputy Prime Minister that the contents of his statement would be reflected in the Commission’s report.

He recalled the precise terms of the Commission’s mandate and, in that context, stressed the position of all three Governments represented on the Commission as to the question of settlements. Their vote in favor of resolution 446 ( 1979) was a dear indication of that position.

On the same day, 27 May, the Commission held an open meeting with a Syrian delegation composed of Mr. Haitham Keylani, Major-General Adnan Tayara, head of the Syrian delegation at the Mixed Armistice Commission, Mr. Shaker Houssami, Mr. Bechara Kharouf and Mrs. Razan Mahfouz, all from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Mr. Keylani stated that, in the view of the Syrian Government, resolution 446 ( 1979) was a further evidence of the concern with which the international community viewed the explosive situation in the Middle East and that situation was the result of Israel’s occupation of Arab territories and its refusal to recognize the national inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. As he pointed out, his Government considered that, in a matter which was related to the maintenance of peace and security, it was imperative for the Security Council not only to express concern but to take the relevant measures provided for in Chapter Vll of the United Nations Charter.

Mr. Keylani observed also that Israel’s practices in the occupied territories-in particular the Golan Heights, where towns and villages had been replaced by Israeli settlements-were consistent with the aims of Zionism which involve annexation of occupied territories and the enslavement of the local population.

In his reply, the Chairman noted that the purpose of the Commission in coming to Syria _was to fulfil to the greatest possible extent the mandate entrusted to it by the Security Council. It had been the intention of the Commission to visit all the parties concerned in the area. However, the possibility for the Commission to go to the occupied Arab territories had to be ruled out because of the attitude of the Government of Israel in that respect. In order to accomplish its task, the Commission resorted to other means of obtaining information.

lt was in that spirit that the Commission had come to Syria. The information to be provided by the Syrian Government, as well as by the witnesses, would make it possible for the Commission to provide the Council with additional information so that the Council, in its persistent efforts to solve the problems of the Middle East, might in the future adopt appropriate measures.

A closed meeting was held at which Mr. Keylani presented the position of the Syrian Government with regard to Israeli policy and practices in the occupied Arab territories, in particular the Golan Heights. Following a historical review of the occupation of Palestine by Zionist elements, Mr. Keylani pointed out that immediately after its invasion of the Golan heights in I 967, Israel started implementing its plan to control the whole area and to expel its inhabitants.

The Golan Heights before the occupation had been one of the most prosperous areas in Syria, inhabited by 142,000 people. living in 163 towns and villages. After the occupation, Israel completely destroyed all those towns and villages with the exception of five, namely Majdal-Shams. Akaata, Massaada. Al-Ghajar and Ein-Kena, and with the stones from the ruins, Israel built in their place 29 settlements for military and other purposes. The destruction of the town of Quneitra which the Commission was going to visit was an example of what had happened in the 1,770 square kilometers still occupied by Israel.

Mr. Keylani pointed out that. of a total of 142.000 Syrian inhabitants in the Golan Heights, only 8.000 had remained while 134.000 had been expelled and compelled to rake refuge in other pans of Syria. where there were also approximately 250,000 Palestinian refugees. The Golan Heights was ruled by a military governor with unlimited authority, including the right to appoint local councils and village mayors and to dismiss them at will. By comparison, in the West Bank, those officials were still elected by the population. In an attempt to annex the occupied area to Israel, the occupation authorities were constantly trying to sever all links between the Syrians remaining in the Golan area and their kin elsewhere in Syria. In fact, the freedom of movement of the remaining inhabitants was restricted even within the five villages. To visit another village, the inhabitants had to obtain from the military governor a special authorization. which had to be applied for a month in advance and was valid only for a few hours subjecting the holder to imprisonment and heavy fines in case of violations. Among the measures taken by the occupation authorities which affected more specially the conditions of life in the occupied territories were the imposition of all Israeli laws, the expropriation of large areas of agricultural land for so-called reasons of security, and the refusal to respond to humanitarian appeals by the International Red Cross, among others, for the reunification of families. Commenting on the education policies of the occupation authorities in the Golan Heights. Mr. Keylani said that all Arabic curricula had been replaced with Israeli curricula and the teaching of Hebrew imposed in primary schools. Of the many primary and secondary schools which existed before, only seven primary schools and one secondary school had been allowed to continue functioning. Syrian graduates of the secondary school were not permitted to pursue their higher education in Syrian universities because the aim of the Israeli authorities was to channel these youths into the labor force needed in Israeli factories. Only after repeated efforts and intervention by the International Red Cross were a few students allowed to register in the Syrian universities. Other measures taken by the occupation authorities in the field of education in the Golan Heights included the intimidation and dismissal of qualified Arab teachers; and educational courses which were compulsory for the 8,000 Syrian inhabitants and aimed at indoctrinating them to serve the aims and purposes of Zionism and the Israeli policies. Further information, said Mr. Keylani, on the educational system imposed by the Israelis in the Golan Heights could be found in the reports published by UNESCO, in particular, in documents 104 EX/52 of 31 May and 200 113 of 28 September 1978

Turning to the question of the geographical changes that had taken place in the Golan Heights as a result of the occupation, Mr. Keylani stated that the whole area had been turned into a military fortress with 29 settlements, a synagogue, a military museum, as well as new roads which are used essentially for military purposes. He recalled by comparison the agricultural prosperity of that area before Israel’s occupation.

On the question of military rule in the Golan Heights, Mr. Keylani noted that Israel had established a military court at Tiberias to administer Israeli laws over the Golan Heights. Ninety-five per cent of the judgements, he said, delivered by the court related to so-called security matters for which the sentence was life imprisonment or hard labor for life with no possibility of appeal.

As to the settlements, Mr. Keylani stated that the 1979 budget of Israel showed the allocations set aside for expanding 11 of the existing 29 settlements. In that connexon, according to a statement by the Israeli Chief of Administration of Settlements, Israel intended to establish

in l 979, 20 new settlements, 5 of which would be in the Golan Heights and it would take over all the necessary land in order to settle 58,000 families thereon over a period of five years.

To be able to pursue that policy Israel had succeeded in expelling most of the inhabitants of the Golan Heights through various means, including restriction of movement, threats, intimidation, burning of crops, depriving them of their means of livelihood and imposing on them heavy taxation beyond their means. Mr. Keylani also pointed out that those settlements were all military fortresses and that the settlers, who were from Al-Jadna, a military agricultural organization that worked in liaison with the Israeli army, were of military age. That, he said, was an additional means of pressure on an unarmed population.

With regard to the nature of the Israeli settlements, he expressed the conviction of his Government that those settlements were meant to be permanent, as confirmed by statements made by various Israeli officials and by the slogan which Israel had applied to the Golan Heights since 1967, namely “Security before peace”. Although the Golan Heights area was included in the security and defense plans of Israel; Mr. Keylani said, security was only a pretext to annex the region since all the relevant United Nations documents indicated that before 1967 the Syrian Army artillery fired only on Israeli military bulldozers entering the no man’s land between Israel and Syria and not on any Israeli settlements

Referring to the differences in the policy of Israel regarding the various Arab territories under occupation, Mr. Keylani observed that Israeli practices varied according to Israel’s goals and to the size of the population in each territory. In the Golan Heights,’ Israel had achieved the following objectives: evacuation of the area by almost all its inhabitants; thwarting of any armed resistance by the remaining inhabitants; reduction to a minimum of the number of violations of human rights, given the small number of inhabitants remaining in the area; exploitation of expropriated fertile lands for Israel’s benefit; and establishment of a military zone to defend ·Israel against Syria.

In connexion with the evacuation of inhabitants, he recalled that in 1967 the Syrian inhabitants wanted to stay in the Golan Heights but that they had been forcibly driven out. For example, in the town of Quneitra, Israel had compelled the inhabitants to leave the area at night through minefields, thereby causing heavy casualties.

In the course of the exchange of views that ensued, Mr. Keylani said that between 1967 and 1973, Israeli authorities had attempted to impose Israeli citizenship on the Syrian inhabitants. Having met with categorical resistance in that regard, they had continued to deny them the attributes of Syrian citizenship and, furthermore, since 1973, they had imposed Israeli citizenship on the Syrian children born under occupation, in the belief that with time the opposition would disappear.

On the question of religion, Mr. Keylani noted that the deliberate destruction of the mosque, particularly in Quneitra, was meant to humiliate the inhabitants and leave them with no choice but to conduct their prayers at home.

As to Jerusalem, it was, he said, a sacred Arab Moslem city with the same status as that of any other part of the occupied territories. That occupied city must be liberated and returned to the Palestinian people. Syria would not accept that a single inch of Arab territory, including Jerusalem, remained under Israeli occupation and, in that regard, it supported the resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council on the matter.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Recent Articles


Khaddam’s memoirs… “letters of love and threats” between Reagan and Assad… America withdraws from Lebanon, Israel retreats, and Syria “is isolated”

2024-10-28

Damascus releases the American pilot amidst shuttle tours of White House envoy Rumsfeld…and Washington foils a secret visit by Hikmat Al-Shihabi In the midst of the U.S.-Syrian military exchanges in Lebanon, President Hafez al-Assad’s illness, Colonel Rifaat’s ambitions for power, and the intensifying Iran-Iraq war, Syrian Foreign Minister Abdel Halim Khaddam met with U.S. Ambassador […]

Khaddam’s memoirs…an American-Syrian clash in Lebanon…and Reagan’s envoy requests a meeting with Rifaat al-Assad after “Mr. President” fell ill

2024-10-27

Khaddam threatens Washington’s ambassador with “immediate expulsion”… and exchange of Syrian-American bombing President Ronald Reagan attempted to contain the crisis with President Hafez al-Assad following the bombing of the “Marines” and the shelling, sending his special envoy, Donald Rumsfeld, to Damascus on November 20, 1983. Rumsfeld, a former Secretary of Defense under President Gerald Ford, […]

Khaddam’s memoirs…the Marine bombing before the Lebanese Geneva dialogue…and America accuses Iran of working “behind the lines” of Syria

2024-10-26

Washington accuses Tehran of being behind the Beirut attacks and criticizes Damascus for “facilitating the Iranian role” Robert McFarlane, Deputy National Security Advisor in the United States, returned to Damascus on September 7, reiterating previous statements about the necessity of a Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon to coincide with the Israeli withdrawal. On the 22nd of […]