Khaddam: “Hezbollah” is an execution tool for Iran’s strategy.

publisher: المستقبل Mustaqbal

Publishing date: 2007-02-03

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Former Syrian Vice President Abdul Halim Khaddam believes that “Hezbollah” is an instrument for implementing Iran’s strategy and is used by Iran to harm Lebanon and the Lebanese people.

In an interview on the “Al-Mustaqbal” television program, Khaddam stated that the reference of “Hezbollah” is in Tehran, and therefore, the directives for its actions come from there. He emphasized that “Hezbollah’s” major mistake is that it is used to harm the Lebanese nation and its people. He affirmed that Iran aims to hold advanced positions in the region to defend its strategy, not only within its territory but through other forces as well. Iran’s strategy extends from the Mediterranean Sea to the middle of Asia.

Khaddam clarified that “Hezbollah” is one of the instruments for implementing Iran’s strategic plans. He compared it to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and the Iranian Army, stating that “Hezbollah” is the same. The party claims its reference is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution.

He mentioned that while “Hezbollah” played a significant role in liberating South Lebanon, its ideology surpasses national boundaries, justifying its use in activities unrelated to the Lebanese nation. He added that if the national issue were predominant, “Hezbollah” would not agree to be used to protect Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Khaddam also discussed the current situation in Lebanon, including the tensions caused by “Hezbollah’s” actions. He noted that the group’s actions, including its involvement in civil strife and other activities, are about protecting its interests. He expressed concern that the situation could escalate and become more dangerous if matters continue to worsen.

He highlighted that Iran’s influence in the region is a significant factor in these dynamics and mentioned the connection between the developments in Lebanon and the broader regional context.

Additionally, the General Observer of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, Ali Sadr al-Din al-Bayanouni, announced that the group is in the process of forming a political party when opportunities arise for party formation within the country. He clarified that they are not just a political party in the conventional sense, but an Islamic organization that engages in the duty of propagating Islam comprehensively, including various aspects of life beyond just worship in mosques. He stressed that their political activity is part of their overall engagement.

Al-Bayanouni explained that their intention to establish a political party aligns with the formation of political parties within the country. He emphasized that the party would be inclusive of all segments of Syrian society, encompassing different sects and ethnic groups. He stated that the party’s door would be open to anyone who believes in its principles and understands Islam in the comprehensive sense they promote.

He also expressed satisfaction with the external activities of the Syrian National Salvation Front, a group he founded alongside Khaddam and other opposition figures. He noted that while progress may be slow, their communication with foreign powers is more productive than their internal activities, which could be hindered by various factors.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Recent Articles


Khaddam’s memoirs… “letters of love and threats” between Reagan and Assad… America withdraws from Lebanon, Israel retreats, and Syria “is isolated”

2024-10-28

Damascus releases the American pilot amidst shuttle tours of White House envoy Rumsfeld…and Washington foils a secret visit by Hikmat Al-Shihabi In the midst of the U.S.-Syrian military exchanges in Lebanon, President Hafez al-Assad’s illness, Colonel Rifaat’s ambitions for power, and the intensifying Iran-Iraq war, Syrian Foreign Minister Abdel Halim Khaddam met with U.S. Ambassador […]

Khaddam’s memoirs…an American-Syrian clash in Lebanon…and Reagan’s envoy requests a meeting with Rifaat al-Assad after “Mr. President” fell ill

2024-10-27

Khaddam threatens Washington’s ambassador with “immediate expulsion”… and exchange of Syrian-American bombing President Ronald Reagan attempted to contain the crisis with President Hafez al-Assad following the bombing of the “Marines” and the shelling, sending his special envoy, Donald Rumsfeld, to Damascus on November 20, 1983. Rumsfeld, a former Secretary of Defense under President Gerald Ford, […]

Khaddam’s memoirs…the Marine bombing before the Lebanese Geneva dialogue…and America accuses Iran of working “behind the lines” of Syria

2024-10-26

Washington accuses Tehran of being behind the Beirut attacks and criticizes Damascus for “facilitating the Iranian role” Robert McFarlane, Deputy National Security Advisor in the United States, returned to Damascus on September 7, reiterating previous statements about the necessity of a Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon to coincide with the Israeli withdrawal. On the 22nd of […]