With Abdel Halim Khaddam on the phone suddenly and without an appointment!

publisher: ايلاف

AUTHOR: صالح القلاب

Publishing date: 2008-07-08

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

It was just an unplanned coincidence. I was with a friend I had met outside Jordan, and our friendship had begun over thirty years ago. Suddenly, our conversation on matters far from politics and politicians was interrupted by the ringing of a mobile phone. I didn’t try to eavesdrop or catch some snippets of the conversation, of which I only heard one side. However, due to my extensive experience in the challenging profession, where there are many connections and relationships with intelligence methods, techniques, and traditions, I realized the significance of the person on the other end of the line. I understood that the conversation taking place was of utmost importance.

My friend burst into loud laughter and said, “He’s right beside me. Would you like to talk to him?” He handed me his mobile phone, and to my surprise, the speaker on the other end was Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam, whom I had not known face-to-face except for a very brief acquaintance. When he was beginning his ascent in leadership in the mid-sixties of the last century, I was still a first-year university student, living in a state of political confusion and disturbance for many reasons.

Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam spoke to me eloquently, choosing his words carefully and displaying great refinement. After expressing his appreciation for my writings in the Middle East newspaper, he informed me that he would soon launch a satellite channel under the name of the Syrian opposition. Perhaps sensing that I had many things I hesitated to say, as the time and context were not suitable, he promised that his first appearance on this channel would be a reflection on his personal journey and his years in leadership positions within the party and the government.

Less than two weeks later, I read three episodes over three weeks published by our veteran colleague Ghassan Al-Imam in this newspaper. I, like perhaps others, was surprised to find within these three episodes remarkably positive impressions about a man who was always considered the staunch opponent of the divided Syrian regime, with his sharp tongue sparing no one. His memory, supposed to be rich with many stories of his encounters with Yasser Arafat and other Arab officials, characterized by delicacy and a minor role!

As I read these truly enjoyable episodes, firstly because the writer is our esteemed veteran, Ghassan Al-Imam, and secondly because the subject of discussion is the enigmatic figure, Abdul-Halim Khaddam. Thirdly, I was a minor player in this political equation under discussion, and I consider myself a witness to a part of that period. As I read these episodes, I paused attentively at what (Abu Jamal) mentioned about the group led by Salah Jadid – Noureddin al-Atassi, which President Hafez al-Assad overthrew in November 1970.

He described the era of this group, which spanned from February 23, 1966, to November 1970, as clean and free from corruption. This is something every Syrian citizen who lived through that period knows. President Nour al-Din al-Atassi lived in a small apartment alongside many others in an unremarkable building. Salah Jadid often drove a Peugeot car himself. Youssef Zouein, the Prime Minister, was frequently seen in a low-tier restaurant in the famous Shalan neighborhood in Damascus. This was also the situation for Dr. Ibrahim Makhus, who, when he sought refuge in Algeria to live there after the November 1970 coup, insisted on receiving only the salary of an Algerian doctor in Algerian currency.

It is not expected for Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam, from the perspective of non-Syrian brethren, to start his satellite channel, intended to be the voice of the Syrian opposition, by criticizing himself and his personal experience in ruling the Ba’ath Party continuously for the past forty-five years. However, it is essential and important that, with his accustomed boldness, he addresses the experience of this party as a party. He should discuss how comrades turned against each other on February 23, 1966, then later in November 1970, and all the massacres carried out by Saddam Hussein against his comrades.

Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam must speak about all these matters because what is in his heart does not belong to him alone but is the property of the Syrian people, the Iraqi people, and all those who went through this party and stopped at one of its stations. This includes every Arab who believed during the years of national storms and upheavals that the Arab nation is one and has an enduring message.

There are no longer those who led the front lines in the period before the corrective movement, which Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam is expected to consider, given that he was the right-hand man of President Hafez al-Assad during that time. What is it that this corrective movement rectified, as long as the regime it overturned was clean and non-corrupt? Syria, as (Abu Jamal) stated, witnessed corruption after that to an extent unparalleled, even in Latin American countries. Except for Dr. Youssef Zouein, who, due to his purity and simplicity, now lives in a one-room house in Budapest, and Dr. Ibrahim Makhus, who refused to collaborate with Saddam Hussein’s regime against those who turned against him and his comrades. This is despite all the temptations offered to him and to the group that remained committed to what is called the Nour al-Din al-Atassi – Salah Jadid era.

There is no dispute that the Nour al-Din al-Atassi – Salah Jadid era was a period of political adolescence and ideological rigidity that isolated Syria significantly. This led to the group paying a high price, especially when they foolishly sent Syrian army tanks, disguised with slogans of the Palestinian Liberation Army, to Jordan during the famous and well-known events of September 1970. However, it is expected, to the same extent, that Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam includes in his anticipated review the subsequent stage of Syrian intervention in Lebanon’s affairs and how this Arab country reached its current state. This is especially significant since he is well-versed in the twists and turns of that period and its numerous intricacies, as he played a key role in its political equation.

Mr. Abdul-Halim Khaddam may not be able to fulfill the slogan of change that he raised, especially after distancing himself from the regime, which was his second emblem. After leaving Syria to save his life and the lives of his children and family, and rightfully so, the current Syrian equation is extremely complex. Internal factors intertwine with regional and international factors. In reality, there is no organized and effective opposition within Syria that can be relied upon to bring about such a change in the near and foreseeable future. This makes the mere criticisms and reviews promised by (Abu Jamal) a significant achievement for the Syrian and Arab generations, who are supposed to know the facts and understand the reality that will undoubtedly become part of Arab history in this century and the preceding twentieth century.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Recent Articles


Khaddam’s memoirs… “letters of love and threats” between Reagan and Assad… America withdraws from Lebanon, Israel retreats, and Syria “is isolated”

2024-10-28

Damascus releases the American pilot amidst shuttle tours of White House envoy Rumsfeld…and Washington foils a secret visit by Hikmat Al-Shihabi In the midst of the U.S.-Syrian military exchanges in Lebanon, President Hafez al-Assad’s illness, Colonel Rifaat’s ambitions for power, and the intensifying Iran-Iraq war, Syrian Foreign Minister Abdel Halim Khaddam met with U.S. Ambassador […]

Khaddam’s memoirs…an American-Syrian clash in Lebanon…and Reagan’s envoy requests a meeting with Rifaat al-Assad after “Mr. President” fell ill

2024-10-27

Khaddam threatens Washington’s ambassador with “immediate expulsion”… and exchange of Syrian-American bombing President Ronald Reagan attempted to contain the crisis with President Hafez al-Assad following the bombing of the “Marines” and the shelling, sending his special envoy, Donald Rumsfeld, to Damascus on November 20, 1983. Rumsfeld, a former Secretary of Defense under President Gerald Ford, […]

Khaddam’s memoirs…the Marine bombing before the Lebanese Geneva dialogue…and America accuses Iran of working “behind the lines” of Syria

2024-10-26

Washington accuses Tehran of being behind the Beirut attacks and criticizes Damascus for “facilitating the Iranian role” Robert McFarlane, Deputy National Security Advisor in the United States, returned to Damascus on September 7, reiterating previous statements about the necessity of a Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon to coincide with the Israeli withdrawal. On the 22nd of […]